EDIT: Framing a woman entirely as a passive victim of her hormones or postpartum biology strips away the concept of adult female autonomy.
By reducing her actions to medical helplessness, the defense inadvertently relies on old, patriarchal tropes... making Lindsay Clancy defenders, ironically, the ultimate anti-feminists.
Where are all the GoFundMes for those men? Where are all the men standing outside protesting their innocence and saying they understand why they did what they did? Some guy just killed 8 of his family members recently, where are the GoFundMes for them?
I'm not even trying to be sarcastic or argumentive, I'm unsure of who specifically you mean. Is this an American politician? I will say however that any politician man or woman should never be an example to follow for morals.
Your comment was about women on the internets response to to the trial and how repulsive it was compared to how men act.
Last week, Ratko Mladic died, an infamous war general convicted of committing a genocide. His life was celebrated widely among men, including those in power and not just some weird internet campaign
I had to Google him because I still didn't even recognize the name. The dude was from Bosnia or Serbia or something? I'm going to guess that society in Serbia is potentially different than what is happening in the US. I don't know much about Serbia though at all other than they got bombed in the 90s and there was a sniper alley that people paid money to kill people.
Horrific that those men would do that but that doesn’t absolve these women. Whataboutism isn’t a free pass for shitty behavior.
However people supporting that war criminal all Serbs or Serb supporters and not because they are men.
Women who are who support Lindsey Clancy are women supporting another woman and mother. It’s a tribal identity reflex.
I wouldn’t trust a Serb to be a juror for a Serbian war criminal, what makes anything tied to gender related issues so hard is the entire population is biased toward their own gender and it’s also unfair to stack it with men who might be biased against them.
This should be a question of guilt or not guilty by reason of insanity but instead it’s become a tribal identity test. At that point there’s no good outcome.
These women are as out of line and insane as men who defended Andrew Tate. Delusional tribal shit.
I don't know why you're implying I am saying this absolves anyone of anything.
Their support of Mladic is very much a tribal identity reflex, his war crimes and genocide were a tribal identity reflex.
Not a lawyer, but isn't the whole thing with a jury is they dont have outside influence? Like all these psychos on tiktok and shit, have literal zero influence on this case right?
300
u/Available_Dot_935 4h ago edited 3h ago
EDIT: Framing a woman entirely as a passive victim of her hormones or postpartum biology strips away the concept of adult female autonomy.
By reducing her actions to medical helplessness, the defense inadvertently relies on old, patriarchal tropes... making Lindsay Clancy defenders, ironically, the ultimate anti-feminists.