r/interesting • u/Wonderfulhumanss • 4d ago
SOCIETY The Zammit family refused to sell their five acre property as an entire Sydney suburb was built around them
4.7k
u/Consistent-Fill-324 4d ago
It's like the Mayor's house in Sim City.
1.1k
u/tmgc1234 4d ago
Ah the neighborhood must have reached 500 population!
→ More replies (1)277
u/EatADickStraightUp 4d ago edited 2d ago
Legendary comment! Reticulating spines.
EDIT: SPLINES. Vholy typo!
117
u/Arthur_da_King 4d ago
splines*
→ More replies (1)30
u/symbha 4d ago
Freudian slip accepted.
→ More replies (1)18
u/Imaginary_Chef1365 4d ago
I hear that woman's voice saying "Reticulating Splines" in my head every morning upon waking
5
→ More replies (3)40
u/tmgc1234 4d ago edited 4d ago
A classic! "Reticulating Splines for the last time." is my fave cause its from the TS2 Apartment Life loading screen that marks the end of The Sims 2 era.
49
u/Paultsar 4d ago
Mayor rocks, according to city blocks!
→ More replies (4)8
u/tmgc1234 4d ago
I like how the advisor's message about this lets them specify who and where the Sim in your city said this even though that Sim is somewhere else or in their home.
29
u/CuppaJoe11 4d ago
Holy shit sim city is a game I haven’t played in years but I was addicted to it for a while.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (17)10
3.5k
u/Wonderfulhumanss 4d ago
The Zammit family owns this five acre property in The Ponds, northwest Sydney. As surrounding land was sold to developers, hundreds of homes were built around them, leaving their property as a striking patch of green in the middle of the suburb.
The family has repeatedly chosen not to sell, despite the land being estimated to be worth tens of millions of Australian dollars and potentially accommodating around 40 50 homes.
3.8k
u/ireally-donut-care 4d ago edited 3d ago
I would sell. Just me personally, if I had that much money, I am getting a better view than having to look at hundreds of spec houses.
Edit Thanks for rewards and all the upvotes, and all the great ideas and funny things "we" would do with this property. To some of you with your panties in a wad, CTFD. We're all just playing "if I won the lottery here".
1.8k
u/Reikukaja 4d ago
I also wouldnt like the attention of being the person in that house. It stands out too much, in contrast to its surroundings.
1.3k
u/14ktgoldscw 4d ago
Yeah, I don’t know anything about the climate there but you can’t get trees or hedges or anything? It looks like a house from a Tim Burton movie.
726
u/StandardDiver2791 4d ago
Was wondering the same thing: why the landscape is so barren.
509
u/Forsworn91 4d ago
damn right, why the hell is it so empty? plant a garden, trees, ANYTHING
→ More replies (26)327
u/chromecastbuiltin 4d ago
I reckon there’s 23 bodies buried under that lawn
→ More replies (33)235
u/Forsworn91 4d ago
Water feature, statue garden, hedge maze, scale model of the London train system with working tracks and trains, ANYTHING!
It would like living on a footfall field.
→ More replies (18)81
u/Abject-Practice7310 4d ago
If the neighbors are unfriendly, I'd plant a field and spread manure there whenever it's the best time for a barbecue.
But in general, I'd prefer to give it up and start over somewhere else with the 50 million AUSD. Okay, it's your house and home, but the surroundings are awful.
→ More replies (9)51
u/Forsworn91 4d ago
The Australian yellow blossom, beautiful tree, shade, not huge, and BEES swarms of BEES.
Just… put up a hedge fence or SOMETHING
→ More replies (0)89
u/techb00mer 4d ago
It was basically farmland before developers bought it all up, so that’s why there is almost no vegetation.
Granted, they certainly could have planed a few trees closer to their house for privacy.
→ More replies (12)49
u/aggro_aggro 4d ago
The new houses also don´t have room for vegetation.
The big property would have... at least two bushes... but no.
Crazy to have such a big area around your house and nothing on it...
→ More replies (1)22
u/waaaghbosss 4d ago
It's just ugly. That massive lawn tells me it isn't a water issue.
→ More replies (4)88
u/AmazingRefrigerator4 4d ago
Fewer hiding places for the venomous animals.
64
u/Awkward_Material 4d ago
Fewer hiding places for the sneaky developers' agents. Can't get to the house if you can shoot em from 200 yds.
→ More replies (6)16
→ More replies (2)20
→ More replies (46)31
u/meowmeow_now 4d ago
The house is so expensive looking, why no garden or landscaping?
→ More replies (12)205
u/tpa338829 4d ago
Sydney has a climate similar to Los Angeles.
Not only could a lot of cool native trees grow there, having THAT much lawn is criminal from a water use standpoint.
88
u/PrinceCavendish 4d ago
insane to just mow it and keep it bare. i would have planted so many trees or just moved
→ More replies (2)51
u/HoneycombJackass 4d ago
At least for privacy around the perimeter.
73
u/czechereds 4d ago
You simply cannot comprehend the spite involved. If he grew a bunch of trees it would just look like a park or forest in the center of the development. Currently it is an alll enveloping testament to one man's resentment for developers.
5
→ More replies (8)14
→ More replies (2)43
u/Efficient-Cherry3635 4d ago
Right, why stop at a privacy fence when you have room for a privacy hedge maze.
→ More replies (1)30
u/JC04JB14M12N08 4d ago
Sydney climate equates very closely with east coast US like South Carolina and Florida and not very closely with LA at all.
→ More replies (4)20
u/regina1808 4d ago
As an Australian, Sydney is humid as shit so that tracks. All the people I've met from LA and surrounds say adelaide is the most similar climate wise. City has a similar lay out as well but much smaller with the city between the beach & mountains.
→ More replies (9)30
u/Ion_Source 4d ago
Sydney has a climate similar to Los Angeles.
Where did this idea come from? Sydney gets about 3x the annual rainfall that LA gets. LA's climate is much closer to Adelaide (Mediterranean climate with similar rainfall)
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (13)15
18
→ More replies (39)14
u/Big-Orse48 4d ago
This is your average farmland property in Australia.
The farmers cleared the trees decades ago because they interfered with precious farm land.
We also have a bad salinity issue now. I wonder why.
At some point, that farm was sub-divided and the Zammits either did the sub-dividing or bought the sub division.
They're stupid to not sell, there's no pristine land they're preserving, it's just grass.
Sell for $60 million and go buy somewhere actually nice and forget about the stresses of life for generations to come.
→ More replies (6)17
u/Biscuits4u2 4d ago
Usually having the biggest, nicest house in the neighborhood is bad for your property value, but I don't know about that if they want to build 50 homes on it.
→ More replies (1)16
26
u/eLishus 4d ago
Just imagine how many times a day would you’d have to say “get off my lawn!”
→ More replies (2)13
→ More replies (53)27
u/Dapper-Ad-4300 4d ago
Well I think that’s the developers whole tactic. If the landowner doesn’t want to sell to us, we’ll just make them stick out like a sore thumb until they get uncomfortable enough or tired of it and finally sell
24
u/WarzoneGringo 4d ago
Im pretty sure the developer was just going to cram as many houses on it as they could sell just like the rest of the plot. Not a lot of millions to be gained making the development a vehicle of spite.
→ More replies (1)93
u/Read2Fap 4d ago
they clearly don't need the money
look how huge the house is, they have money
8
29
u/ItsCalledDayTwa 4d ago
I expected it to be a glorious old home but it looks relatively modern and honestly kind of like an ugly mcmansion.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (16)5
u/SuperRockyHobbyHorse 4d ago
Not enough money to plant some trees and pay a landscape gardening company though it seems. Or maybe the kids have a deal with the developer and are keeping it nice and flat and tarmac-ready for when they inherit.
→ More replies (1)16
u/kit_kaboodles 4d ago
Yeah, and as someone that lives in Sydney, if you have that sort of money you also don't want to live in The Ponds. It's not an appealing part of Sydney even if you have 5 acres.
→ More replies (5)44
u/sc00bs000 4d ago
id retire and be living it up on the beach somewhere
→ More replies (4)25
u/Appropriate_Major711 4d ago
Someone with that type of property likely already has a beach house or two
→ More replies (9)44
u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins 4d ago
It's the kind of situation you don't end up in unless your are a person who irrationally NEVER sells lol...
don't worry the kids will sell once their parents pass.
11
u/The_Nepenthe 4d ago edited 4d ago
I mean, given some unforeseen event, the value will probably rise for quite a lot longer.
Right now it's just a suburb by the looks of things, hold onto it until people want to intensify the area and the money will get a lot bigger because they own a large property you could build something larger and taller on.
Edit: looking at the time lapse from this being built and I wonder if they owned a large amount of the land around the house itself?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (2)15
u/Coololdlady313 4d ago
That's exactly what happened where I live. A formerly borderline neighborhood became a conglomeration of upscale shops, restaurants, hotels and of course, medical facilities. One man refused to sell his property while streets were gobbled up by developers. Big piece of land, just as barren, sticking out among all the hoity toityness. Some time later he died, kids sold and no one can tell you were it was, the kudzu of avarice covered it up completely.
→ More replies (7)13
u/bjos144 4d ago
Not me, if I was rich I'd donate it under the condition it be turned into a wonderful park and the house be turned into a library. Imagine living in that neighborhood and that green space was available for kids to play, pickicks, events and so on. It could be a wonderful quality of life for the neighborhood. You're still sticking it to developers because at this point the houses have sold so you'd be increasing the property value for the current owners and the developers never got to earn a dime off of your property.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (314)5
u/dandaman2883 4d ago
Agreed, that's enough to have generational wealth to pass down
→ More replies (2)181
u/FrogsMakePoorSoup 4d ago
But why no trees?
57
u/SnowX2 4d ago
That's what hit me; 5 acres of property, surrounded by hundreds of houses and zero trees, no privacy. Just grass. What's the point?
→ More replies (6)5
95
u/Ylaaly 4d ago
Having that much land and only a... boring lawn. They could have trees and flowers and a vegetable garden and maybe a pond or even a fake river. There is so much potential in that area. And all they have is a lawn.
These people are poor in their own way.
→ More replies (2)14
u/bluespruce5 4d ago
I would load that land up with so many trees and native perennials and have such a wonderful time caring for them.
→ More replies (2)66
u/user-the-name 4d ago
Do these people look like they have even a milligram of taste in their bodies?
9
→ More replies (9)31
u/Shano_mack_76 4d ago
Was literally km's of rolling cow paddocks beforehand
42
u/Esava 4d ago
They could start growing some trees. Yeah it will take a few years for them to be proper trees but it would be much better visually but also for the environment with birds, insects, water retention etc..
→ More replies (2)14
u/SteampoweredFlamingo 4d ago
And you can buy grown trees!
It's expensive as all get out, but something tells me that money isn't a super important motivator for these people.
→ More replies (1)79
u/PeanutButterToast4me 4d ago
A spite mansion.
→ More replies (7)53
u/BikePuzzled1165 4d ago
If it were me, I'd do it for spite. Refuse to sell just so that there weren't more of the same cookie cutter homes - cheaply produced, overpriced, crammed way too close together, and devoid of character. Even if my own property remains devoid of character and privacy.
But that's me speaking as a jaded American who would have been forced to give up that land through eminent domain most likely.
Also, to be fair, I 100% would have put some kind of landscaping effort I to it. Trees, gardens, a really tall fence. Something. But that's mostly because I don't believe in grass lawns. I think they're wasted space.
→ More replies (27)19
u/brokenmindedone 4d ago
I imagine all the direct neighbors love it though, these houses are so tightly packed that the breathing room thanks to this property must be a blessing.
I feel for them when it does eventually sell and suddenly they have another unit about a meter from their window
→ More replies (4)97
u/84_Mahasiddons 4d ago
"Green" is a little generous when it's a featureless flat lawn. Might as well be carpet
→ More replies (4)48
u/jhau01 4d ago
Exactly. If it had landscaped gardens and mature trees that the family had spent decades working on, I could understand having an emotional attachment.
But a bland McMansion surrounded by acres of featureless, unshaded lawn, bordered by hundreds of identical houses? I would be screaming to get out of there.
→ More replies (8)58
u/SnooDoodles3707 4d ago
What did they win. A dismal mansion surrounded by an Edward scissor hands suburb nightmare. Ill sell out.
→ More replies (7)20
u/Johnny_Banana18 4d ago
If I was insistent on staying, I’d plant a bunch of trees so at least I can pretend I had some solitude.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (136)12
u/n0rsk 4d ago edited 4d ago
potentially accommodating around 40 50 homes.
5 acresthat is like 10 homes an acre. Maybe it is the American in me but 0.1 acres of land is way too small.
→ More replies (10)
4.2k
u/FrankesteinsLog313 4d ago
All that grass. Zero trees. Zero plants.
1.2k
u/Mental-Currency-4494 4d ago
It's so weird. What's the point of all that property just to have it be all grass? I can't even imagine the water bill.
660
u/maxdacat 4d ago
Sometimes in Sydney we get free water from the sky
165
u/Mental-Currency-4494 4d ago
In Utah they'd get a $10,000 water bill, unless they grew alfalfa or made it a golf course, then they'd get take breaks and public funding.
66
u/desertvision 4d ago
And, you get arrested if you collect your rain runoff. It's fucked around here in a lot of ways.
Also, don't forget that water is readily available here for data centers used to spy on you.
→ More replies (14)34
u/Bless_u-babe 4d ago
That’s bizarre. Why is collecting rainwater illegal? That’s like an anti environmental move.
23
u/Lazy-Meal-6156 4d ago
Idk where they live but it’s legal in all 50 states in the US, some states just have restrictions or you need a permit. Utah you need a permit and can collect 2500 gallons a year.
→ More replies (8)11
u/Assika126 4d ago
We actually get breaks on our sewer bills if we collect rainwater here where I live
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (18)9
u/a_code_mage 4d ago
Firstly it’s not true. You can collect a certain amount of rainwater in Utah, and after a certain threshold you need a permit.
But it’s actually to protect the environment. In western states, a lot of rivers are fed into from rainwater runoff. If too many people do it and it isn’t accounted for, it can potentially reduce or dry up river water.→ More replies (5)17
u/caydjj 4d ago
Something’s wrong with your water bill. In my Utah town, we pay $0.10 per 1000 gallons. Even if you watered a ton and used a million gallons in a month, that would still only be $100
→ More replies (19)20
26
u/PhiCloud 4d ago
The dead grass in the nearby plot suggests this is not one of those times. That in turn suggests irrigation.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (22)16
34
u/thefoodiedentist 4d ago
They have it for investment now. No point investing a lot when buyers are just interested in land, not the property.
→ More replies (6)11
u/crespoh69 4d ago
That would also hurt to put so much care into trees only to have it all ripped apart the day after it's sold :(
→ More replies (2)32
u/IllllIIlIllIllllIIIl 4d ago
1) as a conspicuous display of your wealth by showing that you can afford to own land but not grow crops on it and
2) provide a large, visually-uninterrupted buffer zone such that the peasants cannot gather en mass in a sneak attack against your manor→ More replies (6)→ More replies (44)9
u/Kazeite 4d ago
It's a wealth flex. "Look at how much land I can afford to just keep empty!" 🤷♂️
→ More replies (1)139
u/Thunderplant 4d ago
Absolutely dystopian. How can you have 5 acres and not put a single plant on it beyond the lawn?
→ More replies (21)21
u/MangoCats 4d ago
In Miami I planted 3 coconut palms in the front yard - my neighbor was an older man, he related the story of how the whole neighborhood had coconut palm trees but they all died in a blight 30 years earlier, heartbreakingly sad - he'd never plant another one. I never had a problem, here 25 years later they're still healthy.
15
u/PuzzleCat365 4d ago
It helps that there are no other ones around. Harder for the disease to spread. That's why mono-culture is so susceptible to disease and bugs.
→ More replies (1)49
u/IM_INSIDE_YOUR_HOUSE 4d ago
The obsession with sterile, golf course yards is so psychotic imo.
→ More replies (2)414
u/jayp0d 4d ago edited 4d ago
Yeah, that bothered me a bit. But overall happy that they fucked with the developers and didn’t sell their property. I’d have planted a small apples/pears orchard, some blueberry bushes and a few grapevines. Would’ve been amazing.
→ More replies (59)90
u/Nerdmitage 4d ago
If you had you know all those neighbors would steal everything that fruits. How their "yard" isn't treated like a park by the local kids astounds me.
But it's true they could have planted some trees and things but something tells me they didn't want to enrich the view of the suburbanites around them.
→ More replies (34)86
u/jayp0d 4d ago edited 4d ago
I don’t know where you live but people generally don’t steal fruit from other’s gardens. Most people actually leave their surplus fruit outside their gates for people to eat anyway. I believe the photo is from Sydney and I live in Melbourne.
→ More replies (34)32
u/Nerdmitage 4d ago
Oh no I'm in Canada. It all depends on location but suburban kids here get bored and wander around and anything in grabbing distance is gone.
I also had a neighbor who would get up early and come cut my peonies and poppies down. She likes flowers in her home and thought I was wasting them leaving them on the bush. I finally talked to her about it and told her I have cameras now and she should ask. She said she hated seeing them just die on the bush and I said how is that different from dying in your home? I leave them for the bees and bugs to enjoy and, when they're there, I smell them every day when I walk the dog. Well she was at work and didn't see that, just assumed they were "neglected". B I grew them and water them! 🙄
I'm just saying people in that large of a development and there's no moochers? Not one person who eou hope a fence for free fruit? Is Australia just a country of angels?
9
u/jayp0d 4d ago
I mean it probably happens. If one my branches is slouching into my neighbour's house they can take a few fruits off of it. No one would mind that. But generally people don't jump into other people's gardens. Sure, unruly teenagers can do all sorts of dodgy things and we do have a problem with them at the moment. But the vast majority of the people (and their kids/teenagers) are pretty well behaved. At least that's the case where I live. But everyone's mileage can vary. I live in the outskirts of Melbourne, almost regional. So there is that. And I'm sure we have people like your neighbour as well. haha.. I don't think Australia is very different from Canada that way.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (10)6
u/MangoCats 4d ago
With that much space you can put the fruit trees far enough from the fences to be unreachable. Plenty of people take the easy pickin's not so many are willing to go full parkour trespass for a pear.
→ More replies (6)25
u/Hypo_Mix 4d ago
It would have been a grazing property, I assume they sold the surrounding area to developers. Given the rates they would be paying, they are going to sell to developers eventually anyway.
→ More replies (9)11
u/Grexxoil 4d ago
That must be one of the most boring five acre property in the world. It does not even keep the neighbours far away, it really seems pointless.
46
u/AlbatrossNo1562 4d ago
All that concrete around the house too. Money does not buy taste
→ More replies (13)16
u/Commercial-Height873 4d ago
They have more grass than all of the houses have built around them.
→ More replies (2)11
u/topscreen 4d ago
Yeah, on one hand, love the punk feeling of sticking it to the man... but why did you fight the suburb to live in a liminal grassfield in the suburb? House isn't even old, they're just fighting for a McMansion
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (179)37
u/badideasgonegood 4d ago
I live just up the road and went to school with them, it was all farming land for the past 100y which is why there’s no trees
→ More replies (14)44
u/Sweeper1985 4d ago
Bro my garden is half compacted building materials and I'm still planting trees and shrubs in it. These people have been there for like 20+ years and not a single plant other than grass? Psychopaths.
→ More replies (4)34
u/flying_butt_fucker 4d ago
That whole neighbourhood is r/urbanhell. Not a single tree in sight. And I'm pretty sure these houses are so close to each other, you can hear your neighbour come.
→ More replies (2)
670
u/Hawkwise83 4d ago
Plant some trees at least.
→ More replies (12)194
u/Sad_Reveal_1970 4d ago
Or build a fence. Zero privacy and an obnoxious view of so many homes.
→ More replies (4)49
u/labrat611 4d ago
look at picture 3 :)
28
→ More replies (5)14
u/Sad_Reveal_1970 4d ago
I didn’t even notice that! Lol it still feels like zero privacy though.
→ More replies (1)9
822
u/seandavisaus 4d ago
I drive past this everyday.
The big developer in that area called Bathla just went bankrupt.
So Zero chance they will get that money again.
435
u/Va1kryie 4d ago
Doesn't really seem like they want it
→ More replies (7)158
u/PailingRaint 4d ago
Tbh they probably own other houses and barely live at this one, if they live there at all. They could very literally just be using their F U money for its intended purpose.
110
u/DukeKazoo 4d ago
This is an area of Sydney which was (comparatively) dirt cheap even 15 years ago. They have apparently owned the plot for several generations so they’re not necessarily particularly wealthy. The combination of Sydney’s urban sprawl and a large property development project has caused the land to increase exponentially in value.
→ More replies (16)65
u/Alarmed-Newspaper994 4d ago
This sort of thing happens a lot in the UK. Generational homes dating back hundreds of years that are worth an absolute fortune are lived in and owned by some relatively poor people. It's a weird situation, where they could simply downsize and have loads of money, but they refuse and just live frugally in a 12 bedroom Georgian mansion.
Basically people living on something like £50k a year in a £10 000 000 house where £25k of their income goes on bills.
→ More replies (7)31
u/domalino 4d ago
It's usually because they're upper class descendants of aristocracy and to sell the house would be shameful socially, both in terms of the social status of the living family and for selling off something that's been in the family for 250+ years. So they end up cash poor and asset rich.
Plenty of them do sell up eventually, and sometimes someone in the family does well for themselves and then has the money to get back on top of things.
→ More replies (8)33
u/MindCorrupt 4d ago
Have they considered growing copious amounts of weed under their estate?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (17)134
u/GalcticPepsi 4d ago edited 4d ago
Work with their son, they live there and are just well off from working hard. Up at like 4am every day finish work at like 7pm And the comment above you is correct, they don't care and don't want to leave their family home.
65
u/Goatknyght 4d ago
If you have to get up at 4am and return home at 7pm, that ain't living unless you really, and I mean REALLY love that job.
32
→ More replies (2)11
u/DenverCoderIX 4d ago
I do that for minimum wage in Spain and I hate my job.
You are right, it is not living.
→ More replies (16)12
30
u/boxjellyfishing 4d ago edited 3d ago
I don't see why that matters.
When they are ready, some developer, somewhere will be interested.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (55)33
u/fidddlydiddlyee 4d ago
It seems they dont care about the money.
21
u/seandavisaus 4d ago
The owner doesn't but his kids do. He just wants to live in peace for the next 6 years before he moves to south of Campbeltown
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)13
279
u/phairphair 4d ago
Why do Australians hate trees?
205
u/scuac 4d ago
They are afraid of attracting drop bears
10
u/crappenheimers 4d ago
The Australian Museum page on them is terrifying. What monsters
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)35
21
u/Cosmic_MicrowaveOven 4d ago
We don’t, our neighbourhoods are generally leafy af.
My suburb is so full of trees every time we get a decent storm, emergency services can be clearing the roads of fallen limbs for days.
→ More replies (3)18
u/babyybones 4d ago
It's mind boggling. They'll come in the comments and talk about how much bush land we have which is true. But where people actually live? At least in my corner of Queensland all the developments wiped out all the trees which is standard... but no one re-planted. Some of these developments are over a decade old and still look like this.
→ More replies (4)15
u/Brocolinator 4d ago
People do this and then go: "wow it wasn't this hot before..." I knew of a lady who nagged for years of having to pick leaves from a mango tree (like 5m tall and I'm wide), well she finally convinced to cut down the tree by the poor husband who never wanted to do it only to start nagging from the heat after it was cut. The mechanic living in front was fuming at the situation as he told me, I can only imagine the husband.
11
u/frontlineninja 4d ago
most of us love em, its just the rich bastards* who don't
*this was originally going to be a more colourful word but i got a warning about it
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (45)6
u/flying_fox86 4d ago
It's not just that plot either, the whole suburb could do with some trees. Together with the grey roofs, it looks kinda dystopian from above.
→ More replies (1)
88
u/Background_Humor5838 4d ago
How are those houses so close together? Why not just connect them at the point? That's the most aggressively suburban suburb I've ever seen lol
34
u/AusToddles 4d ago
Because houses sell for alot more than townhouses / apartments in Australia. Doesn't matter how tiny they are or how close they are
Until recently, I lived 5 minutes from the house in the image. Watched the entire suburb build up around it.... the heat difference between the "old suburb" (where I lived) and the "new suburb" in summer was INSANE. No shade, no air flow
13
u/Background_Humor5838 4d ago edited 4d ago
I was gonna say it must be awful with no shade. In the US there are minimum requirements for space between houses and the bare minimum is 5-10 feet. Depending on the state or municipality that may be higher. These look much closer. I've only ever seen a suburb with less than 10 feet between houses once and I thought it was kinda funny because you could borrow a cup of sugar from your neighbor by just opening the window lol.
The main issue is, when homes share a wall, certain fire prevention building practices have to be followed but if the houses are separate, they don't have to do the same thing so having houses less than 6 feet apart makes the chances of fire spreading much higher. It also means the spaces between houses becomes a bit of a dead zone. No air flow or good sunlight and I'm sure the grass will be dead.
→ More replies (4)9
u/EntertainerSuper8933 4d ago
From the aerial, it looks like their roofs are almost touching. Could you even fit a lawn mower or a wheelbarrow in between? What is the point of single family? Just stack them up on top of each other and then everyone gets some green space and they could maybe fit a tree in there somewhere
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (10)7
u/WhatHaveYouGeorge 4d ago
Shared walls also means noise, cooking smells, cockroaches and other pests coming through
→ More replies (3)
133
u/Positive-Database754 4d ago
I get it. Stick it to the man. Great for them.
But jesus christ plant something, anything, other than grass on that lawn. Trees, hedges, a big garden, come on. At this size, I'd let nature take over the surrounding edges of my lawn, and just keep the interior maintained. Breaks up the line of sight from the hideous neighborhood, and adds some much needed nature to this barren field of grass.
→ More replies (31)
115
u/Hammered_Eel 4d ago
Is this the suburb that has only one way in And out. and it can take half an hour in peak hour just to get out of the suburbs streets
43
→ More replies (18)19
173
u/dunncrew 4d ago
Great landscaping 🤪 😜 😱 😨
138
u/Japsai 4d ago
No trees, no flowers, no tennis courts, no pool. Just hours and hours of lovely restful mowing every week
→ More replies (18)34
u/monstermayhem436 4d ago
You think they mow that themselves? They definitely hire someone for that
→ More replies (5)18
u/Tidalsky114 4d ago
Probably a reason to fire the tractor up early every weekend and let the neighbors know what kind of land used to be where their homes now are.
8
→ More replies (3)17
61
99
u/thereforeratio 4d ago
You can fit 50 of those other houses on that property
Two completely different philosophies
→ More replies (7)158
u/SlowAffection 4d ago
You could also fit all of those houses onto a single high rise unit on that property and convert the rest back to woodland/public park.
→ More replies (75)
104
u/ArkPlayer583 4d ago edited 4d ago
As an Australian I fucking hate these suburbs. The Australian dream is a house with a good backyard, but it's made us so scared of apartments that developers build these urban hells where you can put your arm out your window and touch the neighbors house.
We would be better off in places like this with apartments to live in with parks full of natives between them.
Also fuck this family for not having anything on the land, plant some natives.
And finally fuck black roofs, Australia is too hot for that shit and it makes a significant difference in power consumption cooling it in summer. Keep in mind these are all very expensive, cheaply built homes with almost no insulation built by developers with likely ties to organized crime.
edit: In this context by native I mean native flora
30
u/visualdescript 4d ago
Those houses have no backyard, and what it results in is a hell scape with no green space whatsoever. How people can say this is a nicer place to live than medium density with parks I don't know.
I think people have lost the plot around what is healthy and what helps with well being.
Edit: also no shops, no community, just little jail cells.
→ More replies (4)15
u/Foreign-Elevator-Boo 4d ago
Little boxes on the hillside
Little boxes made of ticky-tacky
Little boxes on the hillside
Little boxes all the same
There's a green one and a pink one
And a blue one and a yellow one
And they're all made out of ticky-tacky
And they all look just the sameAnd the people in the houses
All went to the university
Where they were put in boxes
And they came out all the same
And there's doctors and lawyers
And business executives
And they're all made out of ticky-tacky
And they all look just the sameAnd they all play on the golf course
And drink their martinis dry
And they all have pretty children
And the children go to school
And the children go to summer camp
And then to the university
Where they are put in boxes
And they come out all the sameAnd the boys go into business
And marry and raise a family
In boxes made of ticky-tacky
And they all look just the same
There's a pink one and a green one
And a blue one and a yellow one
And they're all made out of ticky-tacky
And they all look just the same→ More replies (4)12
u/Crimestar 4d ago
Your problem is the same as us it sounds like. There is a corrupt choke hold on the housing supply and they only build the cheapest most profitable shit while corporations and boomers flip out and rent every other home.
The answer isn’t to ask for apartments. All they build here now are “luxury” apartments, duplexes, and little cookie cutters stacked on top of each other like you see here.
Just go seek out your actual dream. It’s not 600 neighbors with some meth head hangout parks in between. They want us all to be convinced we’d rather live in a subscription rent model next to a strip mall for life. Don’t be convinced of that.
→ More replies (6)10
u/Boom_Box_Bogdonovich 4d ago
It blows my mind how Australian houses aren’t well insulated. The building code needs to check in with the Canadian building code where semi new homes tolerate -40 to +40 comfortably. My house built in the 60’s was comfortable all year round.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (49)12
u/cursy 4d ago
When you said 'natives' I thought you meant aborigines for a second.
→ More replies (4)
52
u/dustin_traynor 4d ago
Might as well be part of the suburb with that monocultural hellscape of a lawn.
→ More replies (5)
31
u/throwawaymask01 4d ago
Genuine question, are there any reasons they can't plan trees there? Like, laws that make it complex, expensive to trim later down the road... I don't know
9
u/SnoopThylacine 4d ago
Can't disturb the soil in any way in case someone discovers all the buried bodies, which is also the reason they can't sell.
→ More replies (7)14
13
u/khakiwallprint 4d ago
This neighborhood is just high density housing as designed by morons, all the downside without the upside
36
u/Japsai 4d ago
Dammit, Zammit! Just sell me the land!
→ More replies (3)12
u/No_Schedule2256 4d ago
Żammit = zam/eet. (Maltese surname)
Source: I speak and am Maltese
4
u/New_me_Cri 4d ago
Source can confirm, maltese too, and seems typical of a maltese too
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (6)5
12
9
u/WhySoCereus1991 4d ago
The lack of creativity with all that space just bugs me for some reason. Just all lawn? Really?
→ More replies (4)
39
u/dunncrew 4d ago
All those other houses look so depressing.
19
u/thoughtfreeze 4d ago
Honestly in the zoomed-in photo the surrounding houses and the central lot all look depressing to me
→ More replies (6)6
15
u/Klutzy-Alarm3748 4d ago
I respect that they fucked with developers, but... for grass?
→ More replies (17)
7
u/StruggleExpensive249 4d ago
I think people are underestimating how stubborn Maltese people can be regarding property.
12
u/omnibossk 4d ago
Perfect if you like model airplanes. A long strip and no trees
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Miserable-Housing407 4d ago
Destroying the land and wildlife by building these hideous houses with little to no native plants or trees. The Zammit family should’ve totally planted trees around their property
→ More replies (1)
6
u/No_Village_1097 4d ago
You'd think there'd be at least one area with a lot of trees...
Perhaps its more about land speculation on the front 2/3rds of the property?
5
8
5
5



•
u/AutoModerator 4d ago
Hello u/Wonderfulhumanss! Please review the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder message left on all new posts)
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.