Why do pay and working conditions change so dramatically when nurses cross a state line? Its kinda crazy how crossing and invisible line makes a difference considered how hard we all work.
Latest BLS median RN wages:
California: $67.44/hr | $140,270/yr
Oregon: $62.00/hr | $129,010/yr
Washington: $59.71/hr | $124,200/yr
U.S. median: $46.90/hr | $97,550/yr (if these wages are wrong please post your correct figure)
Alaska: $44.00/hr | $91,520/yr
Mississippi: ~$40/hr | ~$83K/yr
Alabama: ~$40/hr | ~$83K/yr
South Dakota: ~$39/hr | ~$81K/yr -- actually 73k reported by RN.
it’s not just pay. California mandates ratios including 1:5 med-surg, 1:4 telemetry and 1:2 ICU. Oregon now has 1:4 med-surg/tele and 1:2 ICU. Meanwhile, nurses elsewhere are still carrying 6, 7 or 8 patients.
Why the difference? Part of it is leverage...which we all have at our fingertips!
Some nurses have organized, struck and won major improvements. Others have accepted multi-year contracts where the annual raises barely keep pace with inflation and rising living costs. A cumulative raise over five years can sound impressive until you realize what your paycheck actually buys.
Then every time striking comes up, we hear: “We can’t strike. Patients could die.”
At some point, we have to grow a fucking backbone. Hospitals know nurses feel personally responsible for their patients, and that compassion becomes leverage against us. But if understaffing during a strike is dangerous, why is chronic understaffing the other 365 days of the year acceptable? Not to mention how harmful it is for our health. What the fuck about that.
California and Oregon didn’t get better wages and ratios because their hospitals are nicer. Nurses organized, laws changed, and hospitals adapted.
Being indispensable should give nurses bargaining power, not make us afraid to use it. We need to continue to talk about this, until we do something about it. Stay in this fight, for your patients, coworkers and families.