r/Entrepreneur • u/Naive-Wallaby9534 • 13h ago
Lessons Learned I stopped selling "save time and money" and it might be the best decision I've made. Or the worst
I run a dev shop that builds MVPs for founders. For a while my whole pitch was the obvious one: we save you time and money getting your MVP built. It's what everyone in this space says.
Recently I killed that positioning entirely, and I want to know if I'm right or about to shoot myself in the foot.
Here's my thinking. The founders who chase "cheap and fast" are usually the ones with the smallest budgets, the most anxiety about spending, and often the weakest ideas. They're price shopping, so they're gone the moment someone quotes $500 less. I was competing on the one axis where there's always someone cheaper, and attracting exactly the clients I didn't want.
The founders I actually want to work with, people with a genuinely strong idea who are trying to raise money, don't care about saving a few thousand dollars. They care about their product being excellent, because a polished, well built MVP is what gets them taken seriously by investors. For them, "cheap" is actually a red flag, it signals the work will be cheap too.
So I repositioned as a premium dev shop. The promise isn't "save money," it's "come here to get the best possible version of your product built, the one that gets you funded." Higher price, better clients, work I'm actually proud of.
The bet is that in this space, being the affordable option is a race to the bottom, and being the excellent option is where the real, serious clients are.
But I'm second guessing myself. Am I narrowing my market too much? Is "premium" harder to sell when you don't have a big-name portfolio yet? Has anyone here made the jump from competing on price to competing on quality, and did it actually work, or did the pipeline dry up?
Genuinely want the honest take, including if you think I'm wrong.