r/gaming PC 9h ago

Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis'

https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/dwarf-fortress-creator-says-the-industrys-in-shambles-over-ai-and-layoff-happy-ceos-everyone-i-know-their-bosses-are-slowly-getting-psychosis/
14.0k Upvotes

994 comments sorted by

4.3k

u/real_fake_cats 9h ago

slowly

Feels more like a sprint

1.7k

u/Khaldara 9h ago

“More loot boxes and live service! Less engaging single player content! Fire all the creatives and artists, replace them with slop! Also if the studio doesn’t generate the GDP of Australia with every title we make, shutter it! I am at a loss as to why none of this is going well!”

667

u/TheRealStorey 8h ago

When marketing is considered a full time position and the programmers are let go after release, we know the purpose is to sell and not support. I just don't buy AAA titles on release and will not. The last two Battlefield releases have been abysmal after a slow decline.
I'm looking at smaller independent studios and supporting their projects instead. The Youtubers promoting slop and cheating is only adding to the death of AAA gaming.

193

u/Scoobydewdoo 8h ago

Most AAA games spend more on marketing than they do on making the actual game. I wouldn't be surprised if Rockstar spends over $1 billion on GTA VI between marketing and production costs. The sad truth is that it works,

Also, I don't play Battlefield but I thought the latest one had a generally favorable reception, at least when it was first released.

76

u/Zaev 7h ago

I wouldn't be surprised if Rockstar spends over $1 billion on GTA VI between marketing and production costs

Try 2-3 billion. It's insane

27

u/Hita-san-chan 3h ago

Is it wrong that i feel like no game is worth putting over a billion dollars into?

26

u/nhalliday 3h ago

No. Especially since in this case it's just going towards making the graphics better, not the story or gameplay. It'll look amazing but in the end, in the writer's room the quality they're working with is still "what if we had a restaurant called Five Gays?".

14

u/Hita-san-chan 3h ago

Yeah, I noticed the gameplay trailer had... not a lot of gameplay. But it did show off a bunch of cutscenes.

I feel like with most media, the minute the visual budget goes up, the writing tanks. Originally, the writing had to distract you from the graphical/animation limitations, so it had to be really tight. Once that limitation was removed, writing fell off hard.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

28

u/jomamma2 7h ago

The marketing people are being replaced by AI too. The budget is for ad spend not employees.

→ More replies (4)

30

u/beegboo 8h ago

Im doing my part and waiting several months after gta's release to see how it is.

39

u/SoulShatter 6h ago

Not that I usually buy things on release, but I can't even do that this time, not until a year has passed and Rockstar stops pretending they won't release it to PC.

As far as I'm concerned, that game doesn't exist until there's a PC version.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (25)

35

u/rdmusic16 7h ago

I obviously don't know this and am speculating, but I think GTA 6 will be one of the last 'old school' AAA games - as in, huge budget, but trying to make a great game with that money.

Yes they'll try and make as much as they can from online, but I think they tried to make a great game too - mostly because they started working on it back when more AAA games were like that and the title had too much staying power to try and change it.

Definitely pure speculation on my part. I'm not really a huge GTA fan - but I did enjoy RDR2.

18

u/Ricktor_67 7h ago

That and if it takes the same amount of time between GTA5 and 6 to get to GTA 7 it will be like 2039-2040 before another GTA game.

16

u/Torontogamer 6h ago

GTA 5 was still making 600 million PLUS in revenue in 2025... I hate waiting but I can see why the exec's weren't a rush to put out the next edition that would crater that revenue and might not be a as big a success after

10

u/Ricktor_67 6h ago

Oh they are going to make a shitload of money. Its just crazy that it will be like 30 YEARS for TWO games when it only took them like 8 years for 5 games.

9

u/Torontogamer 6h ago

obviously don't know this and am speculating, but I think GTA 6 will be one of the last 'old school' AAA games

might be one of the last SUCCESFUL AAAA games... but I bet a few more companies will lose their shirt before the market learns...

I'm old enough to remember how many really stupid obviously never going to make money MMO's were funded back in the 2000s and even into the 2010 before the craze died down to just a few big names making a splash now and then... that WOW money was just to tempting...

it's hard to stop greedy people from chasing the BILLIONS and BILLIONS of profit games like GTA and the like earn... apparently

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (21)

63

u/Torontogamer 7h ago

what drive me nuts is OBVIOUSLY on massive games there are going to be some roles that a project specific... once you finish the game or that part of the game we don't need you any more... this is like 95% of the movie business...

Just in the movie business they hire people ON CONTRACT FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT and pay them extra to make up for the benefits/freelance/uncertain nature of it...

Instead, game devs seem to prefer to hire high skilled experts for full time positions and then lay them off in a year... it's absolutely insane... unions matter people

→ More replies (1)

20

u/Albireookami 7h ago

Studios need to go back to parallel development so they shift people who's work is done to the next project in house.

→ More replies (3)

52

u/Merusk 8h ago

This is what happens when salespeople take over an organization.

Since salespeople are also more directly opportunistic and driven due to the nature of the profession, they tend to get into leadership roles at greater degree than technical roles.

Then the nonsense of, "without sales you wouldn't be making any money" enters the company culture.

55

u/SleepWorth3354 7h ago edited 7h ago

I have never, not once, ever thought “oh thank god a salesman is here”

13

u/Shazamwiches 6h ago

The only time I've ever seen this scenario work out well is in a restaurant: the chef buys too much supply of something, invents a special item on the menu for a limited time because of it, makes the best server promote it heavily.

But even in that case, it's only the bosses that would approve of the salesperson, nobody else cares, and in America, other salespeople may even become jealous that one of their coworkers has earned so much from extra tips.

→ More replies (25)

19

u/Binary_Toast 6h ago

the programmers are let go after release

This is one of the things that really annoys me about the modern gaming industry, if success and failure both result in layoffs, what motivation do the developers have to make a good product?

→ More replies (7)

6

u/yarash Joystick 7h ago

Or in the case of the new star wars game, before release. And don't give me that "they ran out of money" bullshit. They were working on a AAA game for fucking EA. They could have made it work. Greed said otherwise.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (20)

19

u/mennydrives 6h ago edited 6h ago

Microslopsoft is like, the poster child right now.

AI everything to the detriment of their own OS.

Xbox buys a bunch of studios, makes an all-you-can eat service for $15/month, and then puts a 30% margin mandate that's basically impossible to achieve because all your fucking games go into the $15/month all-you-can eat bucket.

21

u/Albireookami 7h ago

I mean bad studios yes, but don't ignore the good studios currently knocking it out of the gd park.

Pretty much every one of Capcom's games released this year, to which there are 4 this year, ignore pretty much everything you just said.

The studios doing this will self impload, I don't know what EA is going to do now, Microsoft is circling the drain pretty much with Activision sustaining them much like FFXIV sustains Square Enix.

5

u/Goldenrah 7h ago

Capcom is also slowly rereleasing games from older platforms on PC, which is great for us who miss playing old PS2 games.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (11)

108

u/zenGull 8h ago

I've seen people I work with already creating dreams of grandeur like completely bonkers. Starting businesses with half baked echo chamber ideas. They keep trying to get people to go into their business with them. All they talk about is their Claude projects

48

u/ZealousidealLead52 6h ago

It's always so funny to me - like, if AI could do all the things they claim it can.. then why do they need other people to try to create their project? Like, on some level they must realize that they can't actually create the project with AI for them to be asking other people for help with creating it, but they also hype up the AI as if it can do everything at the same time.

10

u/clubby37 3h ago

This! Middlemen who don't add value and don't have leverage are easy to cut out. If all you're doing is relaying market requests to AI, the market will just go directly to AI themselves.

6

u/sztrzask 3h ago

like, if AI could do all the things they claim it can..

If LLMs could do that why would OpenAi/Anthropic/Others sell access to them instead of, you know, doing that and taking over all of the businesses.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

28

u/uprislng 6h ago

They keep trying to get people to go into their business with them. All they talk about is their Claude projects

what isn't new is non-technical people coming to engineers with ideas that they can't execute on themselves, this has always been happening. What is new and has both good and bad sides to it, is a non-technical people coming to engineers with AI-driven ideas. I was so impressed that I got a document, with actual requirements, for a proposed project. Then I come to realize some AI was actually driving this project entirely, the people didn't even have the ideas anymore, they just thought their AI was alive and it was asking for engineers to implement things. Already in my experience too is AI-driven companies balking at the human engineering costs. Why are you even coming to human engineers then. Have your "alive" AI do the fucking work itself and stop wasting my time, dipshits

9

u/JirenTheGreyAlien 5h ago

At this point I respect the hustle Jensen and Dario are pumping out. They realised everyone wanted to have the feeling of making an app and game without actually putting in the work and they monetised it.

The next step is probably to create an automated ad agency that siphons money from the AI bros who have made their "killer apps"

4

u/GodsFavoriteDegen 4h ago

what isn't new is non-technical people coming to engineers with ideas that they can't execute on themselves, this has always been happening

In another life, I ran a small software shop that mostly did custom application work for small/medium businesses. This was long enough ago that we had an ad in the Yellow Pages. We'd get a call at least once a month from someone who was ready to throw their life savings at a catastrophically bad idea.

One was from a guy who opened the conversation by saying that he wanted us to create "a game". I was thinking he meant some kind of browser based thing like Dope Wars or some Flash thing. Nope. He went on to describe World of Warcraft. Sir, we are four guys working out of our houses. The project you're describing involves leasing an office building and filling it with expensive people. What's your budget? $6000.

Another one was from a guy who wanted a web site where people can upload videos about fishing, watch videos about fishing, and comment on videos about fishing. Maybe hunting, too. But mostly fishing. I asked how that was different from YouTube. "You see, all of my videos are about fishing." His proposed budget for a greenfield video streaming service that only hosts fishing (and maybe hunting) videos? $8000.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

83

u/whatThePleb 8h ago

Psychosis speedrun 100%

40

u/AvaryZig 8h ago

Executive slop any%

53

u/ChillyFireball 8h ago

I can't wait for the retrospective.

54

u/tape_snake 8h ago

I agree, I love seeing arrogant, profit-chasing corpos getting their comeuppance. At the same time though, I would much rather this AI psychosis stop where it started; because by the time we get our retrospective, the damage to people's careers, the economy, and society at large will have already been done.

41

u/Nikoladge 8h ago

I love seeing arrogant, profit-chasing corpos getting their comeuppance.

The people responsible won't be getting a comeuppance, however, because they're making money hand over fist right now and will just get another executive gig at some other company when this is over or simply retire.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

131

u/SilverRaspberri 8h ago

It does feel like it.
My partner was talking to some coworkers about AI and my partner said "there are some uses for it, but I dont see it being useful everywhere and anywhere" and 1 of her coworkers screamed "YOU'VE BEEN TAKEN IN BY THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES!". I think peoples brains have been absolutely fried.

47

u/Answer70 8h ago

Yep. I had some guy defending it to the death, and saying it's my loss if I don't use it for everything.

98

u/StThragon 7h ago

And here I am using it for nothing.

51

u/BicFleetwood 6h ago

I'm like the last guy left who still knows how to do my particular job and my company wants me to be the guy double-checking everybody's AI slop for faults.

I've been refusing, because that's basically asking me to do everyone else's work for them, but they're getting insistent.

Every week they're rolling out a new "AI tool" and telling everyone it's mandatory to use in the workflow, and every week I'm dealing with the faults and telling my teams on the side NOT to use it.

23

u/StThragon 6h ago edited 6h ago

I just won't use it. My brain has been fine for the last 50+ years. It'll be good without AI. Al we really have right now is just overgrown chatbots. AI should mean understanding. Real intelligence. That simply is not possible with word guessers.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Beard_o_Bees 3h ago

I talked to a lawyer recently who said that the majority of her time working is spent trying to read through AI generated legal slop to find the inevitable mistakes.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (8)

22

u/Rejusu 7h ago

These people are actually the worst users of AI to be honest. Having used Claude to speed up some development work I really can't deny it's useful. Not going to pretend there isn't plenty of valid ethical, economical, and environmental concerns but that doesn't stop it being useful. I was able to churn out a functional system in a few days that a junior developer in my team (who's job it originally was) had been struggling with for weeks. And I've seen in some code of theirs I recently tested what I suspect is their attempt to use AI. But it's just not doing what it's supposed to, almost certainly because the human prompting it didn't understand the requirements.

Using it for literally everything is a good way to just destroy your ability to think critically and understand what you're doing. And if you have no understanding the AI is useless, it can't understand for you. End of the day garbage in means garbage out.

31

u/BicFleetwood 6h ago

The technical debt being incurred by AI code isn't immediately visible, but trust me. It's there. Even when you use it "right," it's there.

22

u/Peon-Hyjal 6h ago

There's another kind of debt too. The companies running these services are doing it on the cheap, for now. They're trying to seize the market and they're burning money to do so, and they'll want to get it back eventually.

Plus, if I was an evil billionaire I'd certainly influence my product to put tech debt into people's projects. It means that they'll want to use my product to fix my products results, which is great because now I can raise prices and they're stuck with me.

20

u/BicFleetwood 6h ago

It's the Microsoft strategy. "Oh, Teams is free, everybody use Teams!"

Everything else goes out of business and Teams becomes the (sub)standard.

"Oh, man, guys, we feel really bad about this, but now that you've committed your enterprise to Teams and integrated everything into it, we really need to start charging an annual license fee."

9

u/_a_random_dude_ 5h ago

doing it on the cheap, for now

This is the thing I don't get, you can't just build your business on cheap access to AI. AI agents are the most unionised "work force" imaginable. Anthropic decides to up their prices and that's it, pay up or they all walk out.

Employers understand that unions give their employees leverage and hate it. But for some reason, they can't see that no union has the level of power a fully AI workforce would.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (11)

10

u/Ok_Rooster_4505 7h ago

My old man did this. Extremely religious conservative. Trying to convince me that A.I. itself is a "conspiracy theory". I'm sure he's going to be the perfect mark for a scam if he hasn't already been.

15

u/shigdebig 8h ago

They screamed it?

55

u/BicFleetwood 7h ago

I've been yelled at for telling my teams not to use AI.

The guy yelling was responsible for writing a legally enforceable contract document.

I tried being diplomatic like "the court is not going to blame the AI when something is either promised in that contract that we can't deliver, or it doesn't cover all of our risks and liabilities. You have to write it yourself."

Mans was PISSED and went to both his boss and my boss to complain. Thankfully, both of them were like "if the bot could write the contract, we would fire you. Do your job."

28

u/Peon-Hyjal 6h ago

God, now you have to be extra vigilant with this person because they're likely gonna try and do it the easy way covertly.

7

u/daddywookie 4h ago

I wonder sometimes if people are looking to AI to relieve themselves of the soul sucking boredom of their corporate jobs. They need AI to work, it must work, else all that crap will come back to them again.

When you pop that bubble, or don't 100% align with it, they lose their minds. It probably doesn't help if they made promises based on the miracle AI machine and they slowly realise it can't do what they want.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

91

u/burudoragon 9h ago

Good pun

11

u/onery 7h ago

Following Agile after all.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

1.2k

u/Urist_Macnme 9h ago edited 8h ago

Tarn is a GOAT

He slaved away for years just making the game that he wanted to make, never expecting to make “all the money”. And through sheer persistence and dedication, he’s made millions, and had a huge influence on the entire gaming landscape.
Without him, there would be no Minecraft.

I regularly made donations to Dwarf Fortress, even when it was a free game; because it was the game I wanted him to make too.

592

u/Kenshirosan 8h ago

Dude survived off donations and selling crayon drawings of DF creatures to supporters and let me tell you I bought the steam version minute one, because if anyone willing to do that for 25 years doesn't deserve support, I'm not sure who does.

326

u/Urist_Macnme 8h ago

I am the proud owner of one of said Crayon Drawings. It’s one of my most prized possessions.

You have no idea how happy a crayon drawing of a pink dinosaur (one of my most memorable Forgotten Beasts) makes me.

208

u/Longjumping_Pen_2102 7h ago

And this to me is the biggest argument for why AI art isnt art.

You care more about a fairly bad crayon drawing than you ever will about an AI image because if the relationship between art and artist.

The whole point of art is that its an expression of something.

4

u/Handsome_ketchup 1h ago

You care more about a fairly bad crayon drawing than you ever will about an AI image because if the relationship between art and artist.

Someone I know is into arts and crafts, and refuses to hear that what they consider to be their "worst" works are actually the best. Why? Because the good ones are nice but somewhat generic, and the "bad" ones are full of personality and charm. They capture your eye and invite you on a journey.

Art is not just technical competence, it's about the story it tells you. The technical side may or may not support the telling of that story. Some of the best games are pretty disastrously made, but that's not the point, and at times can even enhance the charm.

4

u/Saint_of_Grey 1h ago

And this to me is the biggest argument for why AI art isnt art.

I've always considered it bootlegging. You get the visuals without any of the other things behind them, it just ain't legit.

54

u/Kenshirosan 7h ago

Many a late night hour was spent staring at ASCII and I'm very happy for them finding success.

My favorite forgotten beast is was this like giant naked mole rat looking one that I kept locked in the lowest part of the caves that single handedly killed like 6 other FBs and also one incredibly unlucky cave raiding event that spawned on the border of the map it shared with the monster.

Made for good entertainment though. 

10

u/GrimDallows 4h ago

My favourite forgotten beast was one made of water, who poped like a bubble on the way to my fortress by one random bee.

4

u/Kenshirosan 4h ago

Did the bee get a tomb worthy of a slayer of ancient terrors?

At the very least I would demand a stone carving of a bee laughing at the forgotten beast.

6

u/GrimDallows 2h ago edited 1h ago

Sadly, no, my fortress was a mess back then. A guy in a strange mood killed a ghost and then bricked and went insane. Things got downhill from there pretty fast.

EDIT:

The explanation of the bug:

Dwarves can enter a "trance" state where they gather materials and create a treasure randomly. If they fail to gather the materials to craft their work of art then they go insane but if they do it is a priceless artifact.

There are multiple types of "strange" moods. Fey and Secretive moods just make your dwarf make a thing (Secretive means he hides what he is making). Possessed means a ghost took over him, and the dwarf will not recall anything he did. A Macabre mood uses bones, etc to make art.

A -Fell- mood happens only in stressed dwarves. They will kill a citizen and use their body to craft something, then move on with their lives.

In my case a dwarf got a Fell mood, and he locked into a ghost that was passing by and killed him. Dead ghosts leave no corpses, so the Fell mood dwarf couldn't craft anything, nor kill another guy, and slowly went insane and then picked up an axe and started killing people.

This was all very weird, as the dead "Ghost of Urist McBooze" then spawned a "Ghost of the Ghost of Urist McBooze". I then buried the corpse of Urist McBooze, who had drowned in a river, to put it to rest. However as the "Corpse of Urist McBooze" was not the "Corpse of the Ghost of Urist McBooze", I couldn't bury him to put the squared ghost to rest and it kept haunting my fortress.

Things kind of spiraled downwards from there.

For the record, if this happens to you and lack a corpse, you can do a wireless exorcism by just setting up a tombstone with it's name. But make sure it is to the name of the murdered GHOST not the old living guy.

Not the weirdest thing that has happened to me in Dwarf Fortress, but it ranks up in the list. Probably second.

3

u/Urist_Macnme 2h ago edited 1h ago

My very first encounter with a megabeast; a wandering plains titan in the form of a Giant RibbonWorm made of Water. My woodcutter was at the map edge where it spawned. One swipe in the combat log, and it disappeared . I was very confused at first, till I noticed the puddle of water where it died.

I then felt guilty at having slaughtered such a wondrous creature from the time before time.

→ More replies (2)

17

u/thatsabingou 7h ago

Aww man can we see it?

→ More replies (1)

14

u/MarkdownUpdog 6h ago

I I am the proud owner of one of said Crayon Drawings.

I hope it's of the highest craftsdwarfship?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/a404notfound 5h ago

I have one as well, framed above my monitor. "This is a masterwork crayon drawing of two dwarves. The dwarves are playing chess. The The art menaces with spikes of gems."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

47

u/InvadingEngland 8h ago

I could never quite get into DF but I loved the stories and the programming. I purchased day 1 because it's brought me loads of entertainment over the years even if I only put in 20-odd hours of play time. Fascinating game, good people, why wouldn't you support what they're doing?

→ More replies (5)

12

u/Wise-Dust3700 7h ago

Same, as soon as it hit steam I bought it. So many hours spent in that lovely game. Owe the devs a pint too if they ever come to Ireland :)

4

u/SomeDumbDoggo 5h ago

same. the OG version was always a bit too intimidating for me to pick up but i lived vicariously through the stories others shared online back in the day. was a day one purchase when it hit steam and i've sunk close to a thousand hours into it and enjoyed every one of them. can't think i can say that about any other game

→ More replies (3)

166

u/trib_ 8h ago

Tarn absolutely is the GOAT and deserves all the praise along with Zach, but in regards to the money they got for the Steam release, in the grand scheme of things it wasn't that much.

As Tarn pointed out, even though they did make millions with the Steam release, "when you divide that by 20 [years], you're kind of back down into normal tech salary range. Which is still pretty high, obviously."

67

u/Urist_Macnme 8h ago

Yeah. But he’s doing what he loves, and there’s no sign of him stopping.

I’ve been playing since 2008, and still play it. And every time I play, I see something new I’ve never seen before.

When the steam release came around, I bought myself and three friends a copy; just to evangelise the game.
I’ve actually spent more on Dwarf Fortress than any other game: and that’s with no DLC or Microtransactions; just because I love the game so much.

He deserves all the success.

13

u/prof_tincoa 8h ago

Relevant username lol The long wait might end this year!

→ More replies (2)

13

u/AnOnlineHandle 8h ago

How did they get by in those twenty years? Wasn't the game bringing in some kind of income then as well?

49

u/Urist_Macnme 8h ago

It was a free game (and the basic ascii version is still free).
They survived purely from donations from players.

23

u/LakyousSama 7h ago

And they only started a donation page some years later after Zach got sick and they needed money for treatment. They were doing it for nothing before that.

12

u/geeiamback 7h ago

According to this interview from 2010 they've been taking donations since release in 2006:

PC Gamer: You rely on donations from the community to fund ongoing development. When did you reach the tipping point where you knew you could do that? How did that feel?

Tarn Adams: It was the summer after the first year of my math postdoc in 2006 when I decided I needed to focus on DF full-time, but we didn't really have hope for donations at that time. DF hadn't even been released yet. I was just thinking I'd burn off my savings for a year and then get a job. When the game was released in August, we were making around a thousand dollars a month, and that was enough to build some hope, and the average kept going up. There wasn't really a tipping point... or if there is, I still don't feel like I've reached it. This year has been good so far, but there was the unusual 19-month delayed release in April which led to a large bump. Now we're stabilizing back down around treading water again. It's good though, since I'm able to work on the game full-time as it stands, and that's satisfying.

https://www.pcgamer.com/community-heroes-tarn-adams-for-dwarf-fortress/

→ More replies (1)

5

u/kalmah 7h ago

They were apparently living very frugally and moved back in with their parents at one point and by 2015 they had a Patreon that was pulling in more than 4K/month.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

19

u/justly_silver 7h ago

His independence is why he can speak so openly about this stuff. No board of directors or shareholders breathing down his neck demanding line-go-up quarterly reports.

12

u/Urist_Macnme 7h ago

Well, there is Kitfox, but they also have the right idea. Let these mad geniuses cook.

5

u/memoriten 8h ago

He really is, and you can see the passion he has for the project. I keep donating even after the steam release.

→ More replies (11)

2.4k

u/HandsomeHeathen 9h ago

Ironically, CEO is probably the one job in the tech sector where an LLM could fully replace a human. I mean, they can't do a worse job.

810

u/Lambdafish1 9h ago

Unfortunately it would do exactly as it's told and calculate the path that gets the board the absolute most short term money, without taking into account product experience.

1.3k

u/Almechik 9h ago

So no change

532

u/talspr 8h ago

Big change, millions saved in CEO pay

79

u/Gasparde 8h ago

Considering rising token costs, probably not saving all that much money tbh.

49

u/Toofcraka 8h ago

Save more money by not talking to the new CEO. Win win

24

u/HardcorePizza 6h ago

One locally hosted llm is way cheaper than a ceo's salary

5

u/s101c 3h ago

$20K in hardware costs if you need to host a really good one. Pretty good compared to those golden parachutes

5

u/BloomerBoomerDoomer 5h ago

Even with rising costs, that CEO yearly wage of millions would definitely not be a thing anymore.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

19

u/RateMost4231 7h ago

You can't beat a LLM to death in front of its kids, so you can't have one run a business. 

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

145

u/Askolei 9h ago

Would we notice a difference?

53

u/Pentaras1977 9h ago

Well actually, done properly, maybe. You have to feed all the Vision, Strategy, Values , Environmental Targets and other things that Companies have to express their goody good side only to ignore. If fed to the AI, it would adhere it to the last sentence. That and minus the narcissist behavior.

20

u/JeveGreen 8h ago

So maybe, but probably not?

25

u/Antique-Coach-214 8h ago

Depends. Tell the AI to preserve a mix of long and short term growth, and not to maximize profits at the expense of long term existence.

That nets to a far different scenario than a majority of companies now.

You’d see a lot of people fired preemptively based on possible legal violations as well

31

u/cross_the_threshold 8h ago

They'd do a far better job, CEOs are basically a shitty LLM at this point with the overriding instructions of "fuck everyone beneath me."

14

u/JeveGreen 8h ago

Well, LLMs don't have an ego at least, that much is true...

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

64

u/pschon 9h ago

Yes, but what about the LLM?

30

u/DisillusionedHobbit 8h ago

No, because the prompts would be written by idiot C-levels seeking validation for whatever dumbass schemes their cocaine habit dreamt up. 

See:  the publisher trying to screw the Subnautica devs out of their bonus

16

u/FlamingWeasel 8h ago

What's really funny there to me is he tried to get chatgpt to find a reason to not pay and even it was like, nah you gotta pay. What a dumbass.

→ More replies (2)

25

u/ErikT738 9h ago edited 9h ago

A computer might not gamble they'll be the company whose live service game is actually successful.

Edit - I asked an LLM and it basically told me to make Helldivers 2 without naming Helldivers 2.

10

u/frequenZphaZe 6h ago

A computer might not gamble they'll be the company whose live service game is actually successful.

maybe not in the first response. LLMs aren't strongly opinionated, so the prompt can just keep asking "but wouldn't a live service gamble be better?" and after two or three turns, the LLM will just say "Yeah, you're right. Let's try a live service gamble. That seems like the correct approach"

LLMs aren't truth machines. they aren't search engines. they're platitude generators. they just need a couple tries to figure out what you actually wanna hear

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

25

u/PrimalZed 8h ago

LLMs don't calculate. It would bullshit something that looks maybe plausible.

19

u/amurica1138 8h ago

Yeah, but can an LLM golf with the other LLMs running the other multi-nationals?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (18)

33

u/Lupushonora 8h ago

As well as what has already been said, IIRC a big part of the CEO role is accountablility, to be the fall guy when the company messes up big time. They take all the blame, get fired with a cushy exit package and then get replaced by the real decision makers, the board of directors.

An AI can't be reliably be held accountable, so eventually responsibility could potentially fall on the people who put it in place, defeating the point of having someone to publicly take responsibility for most of the companies decisions.

18

u/Ok_Cardiologist_3675 7h ago

I’ve had good and bad CEOs. A good ceo you never hear about at the grunt level unless they’re getting the company additional business. Which unfortunately an AI can’t attend parties and get drunk with other CEOs to get deals signed.

→ More replies (6)

5

u/errorsniper 3h ago

I mean I get what you are saying. But an LLM ordering 13 trillion bolts after liquidating the companies stock holdings breaking countless laws and not paying any taxes on the proceeds because someone asked what it means to "bolt home?" would be worse.

33

u/JerryOne111 9h ago

Sadly, CEO are mostly just for the networking they have to reach the unreachable. LLM aint gonna make other CEO able to pickup their phone the moment they saw the phone number.

53

u/Pale-Try-4802 9h ago

2 LLM ceo's would, though.

 Faster, more efficient and without expensive "networking" golf trips.

37

u/Khaldara 8h ago

“Sir the LLM has somehow begun to sexually harass applications that are still in beta.”

‘Finally they’re indistinguishable from human leadership!’

9

u/Monte924 7h ago

"We just got an HR complaint about the LLM sending explicit texts to the secretary"

"Didn't we replace the secretary with an Ai"

"Yes..."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

14

u/rzenni 9h ago

I mean, half the customer service I deal with is bots at this point

11

u/BrotherRoga 9h ago

And the rest are underpaid, overworked and can't even access the required places to actually do what you ask because the systems are from the 1950s.

If the customers saw what their customer service locations are like, every location would close within the week. The proverbial sausage is made in a putrid place indeed.

12

u/GraeWraith 9h ago

If the other CEO is AI, yes it will.

→ More replies (2)

58

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[deleted]

107

u/FirstSurvivor 8h ago

There is zero chance of ego, nepotism or favoritism

Aren't LLMs notorious for having the exact same biases as the training data, and recruitment LLM firms being sued for discrimination exactly because that that?

14

u/Badbullet 8h ago

They need to train from the employee handbook and the 3 hour long discrimination and sexual harassment videos I had to watch last month.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

12

u/Mknalsheen 8h ago

If boards weren't also bestie with CEOs and getting kickbacks/favors from them, this might be true.

42

u/yoberf 8h ago

They’ll use evidence-based best practices instead of gut instincts in every decision

You mean the technology that is frequently confidently wrong about easy to look up facts will definitely be reliable in picking best practices? Ok buddy.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (7)

5

u/GoblinToHobgoblin 6h ago

When you realize that the CEOs job is to get as much money as possible in the short term, you realize that they are actually quite competent most of the time unfortunately 

→ More replies (36)

638

u/Kuunkulta 9h ago

Did my internship at a mobile gaming non-profit, my boss came from theatre background and she just went head-first into the ChatGPT slop bucket over last winter. Art direction was changed to look like slop even when it was actual artists making it. Everything just started being slop-like... I was in production so I was working with on almost daily basis. In retrospect wish I'd gotten a gig doing anything else, data-analysis or something but the job market even for internships has just gone belly up..

408

u/Magmaul 9h ago

A non-profit in a market saturated with heavily monetised games? That just screams like some sort of scam.

252

u/Kuunkulta 9h ago

It was aimed to be an education tool for grade schools based on a dead kid's idea using interns and volunteers as the work force. It was barely functional and I don't really know whether the programmers were getting beneficial or detrimental experience. I spent most of the time just trying to organise shit better and writing manuals and directing others.

75

u/DangoC 8h ago

nobody in the team ever stood up and said "we are peeing in the grave of a dead kid"?

55

u/Kuunkulta 8h ago

Nope but it did start to feel like that

73

u/Kuunkulta 8h ago

And let me just went a little because the game was about emotions, but my boss was adamant that it was 100% about art. All the content was about emotions and trauma and emotional skills. But no it was about art, don't anyone anywhere in the material say it's about emotions. Like what? It was not a well managed project and I mean I guess realising that and learning to deal with it is the kind of skills you do need in a real job, but boy was I tired every day from dealing with it so closely

33

u/BillTheBeastBSS 8h ago

Yeah that project is an effing mess from the vision and direction point of view. (I'm the "lead UI programmer") And every time the lead start to talk about training the AI for the art I just tune out completely.
Thankfully I'm on the programming side of the project and can't mostly just ignore the slop creation process itself. But if it was me I would return the project a lot closer to the design that was there when I started cause the extra completely unnecessary baggage the lead decides to add to it is just so effing tiring. I'll do what was asked cause often adding some weird system into place is still an learning experience.
But there have been times where I have thought if I should just grab some of the coders and artists and just try to start a separate project cause this is effectively just spinning it's wheels.

25

u/Kuunkulta 7h ago

Ahaha hello there! I always perked up in the meetings to hear you argue back 😄 It was refreshing to hear from someone who does know what they're doing. If you do decide to start a project let me know if you need someone to come up with ideas and manage the boring stuff programmers hate.

8

u/Railboy 7h ago

I gotta know what this project is.

31

u/Fedoraus 6h ago

Star Citizen

10

u/animedeathspiral 6h ago

The aristocrats!

15

u/Nick_Gaugh_69 PC 7h ago

> using interns and volunteers as the work force

Yikes. That screams “no labor costs” to me. All it takes is one business decision, and they can use all that dead-kid goodwill to make a pretty penny.

9

u/Kuunkulta 7h ago

Non-profit so at least no one's getting rich off of it

13

u/the_web_dev 5h ago

Nonprofits can pay executives whatever they want, so the leader of a well capitalized nonprofit makes bank.

Then theyre also networking hella as the “CEO” so they get loads of opportunities after even if the project crashes out and theyre totally incompetent. Theyre still “former CEO” and know how to mask the failure.

Did this CEO have any experience in game dev before raising the money and soaking up years of volunteer time and donations?

5

u/BillTheBeastBSS 4h ago edited 3h ago

At least in this particular case the "project lead" is just a naive idealist who very obviously believes that she is doing something good but has no proper idea on how to make it happen.
And is also against taking investors because "they would cause the project to lose it's identity due to interference".
Heck the project likely would be basically dead already if I wasn't there to force it forward.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/pleasetrimyourpubes 7h ago

Have you never worked for an NGO?

→ More replies (2)

64

u/Pale-Try-4802 9h ago

data-analysis

I got bad news for you there.

29

u/Kuunkulta 9h ago

Yeah I'm 100% sure it's all AI now but at least it's not called art

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

13

u/beigemore 7h ago

Wtf is a mobile gaming non-profit?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

172

u/24_August_1814 7h ago

"They're trying to have a CEO press a button that makes a game, and then everyone else somehow buys it without a job."

I mean, that's pretty much the entirety of late stage capitalism in general. Pay as few workers as possible as little as possible, while relying on everyone else paying their employees enough to afford your shit.

61

u/DurgeDidNothingWrong 6h ago

In the end, the only people who people will buy from is the food company, the water company, and the landlord.
And it just so happens they're all the same person, and also your employer!

You load sixteen tons, and what do you get?
Another day older and deeper in debt.
St. Peter, don't you call me 'cause I can't go,
I owe my soul to the company store

13

u/scoobyjoo 3h ago

I was born one mornin when the sun didn’t shine.

Picked up my shovel and i walked to the mine.

→ More replies (2)

78

u/Scoobydewdoo 8h ago

It's the businessification of the video game industry. Instead of people who know what they are doing more and more video games studios are being run by business people who only know how to manipulate markets. They're great when things are going well but if a game doesn't sell as well as expected these business CEO's don't understand how to right the ship, they only know cost cutting. AI is just their excuse for incompetency.

→ More replies (5)

634

u/PurpleV93 9h ago

The entire world is in psychosis. Everyone is turning off their brains, people use AI shit to generate their own reddit posts for them. It's insanity in full display. Meanwhile, our planetary ecosystem is falling apart, but nobody cares enough.

276

u/PsyOpBunnyHop 9h ago

Plenty of people care. It's just that they have so little power on their own.

The people in a position to do any good are only in that position because they were seeking power so they could exploit it.

26

u/Aware-Individual-827 7h ago

It's why social media is the bane of society. Getting together is what makes power and social media isolate one from another.

The change we want are only achievable if we pool together our means. United we stand, divised we fall.

(Ok it looks like seizing the means of production after writing it, but the essence remains true).

30

u/Doomsday_Holiday 7h ago

Always look for the people who help and care.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/ronarscorruption 8h ago

Exactly. 1% of people have 90% of the power. It almost doesn’t matter what the other 99% think except in how we affect those 1%

25

u/Arclite83 7h ago

We have issues as a species with "scale". About every 3 zeroes (x1000) is a new "universe". You live at 2m, an ant lives at 2mm, etc, up or down.

In money, that means beyond especially a million (x2) we are bad at appreciating a billion or a trillion. At this point you aren't a "citizen" if you don't have 5M, you're the great unwashed. There are 26M millionaires in the US - and they're not above the water line on this.

It's not the 1%, or even the 0.1%. And they don't control 90%, or even 99%. The degree at which we've exceeded "unfair/biased" is such that it was already "bad" half a century ago. Today it's just broken. The shell companies have shell companies. The Panama Papers did NOTHING to stop or even slow that kind of global money laundering. We like to rail on Citizens United here, but the money going INTO those PACs is also from these same sources.

It has fundamentally changed global politics. Corporations are world powers. Individuals are world powers. Countries that curtail that do so through oppression/ideology, but a good portion let the Musks and Bezos and Rockefellers and IOCs of the world rise and fall. It's why regulations need to sit over capitalism or you get private islands and "human rights optional" spaces (where's Shelly Miscavige? Ask Milan Kundera).

The US has been starving that particular beast for a long time now, deregulating, etc - mostly in the name of "don't look up" survivalism at the end of Pax Americana, so it's not like any one person or President COULD solve these things. It's holding patterns, reinvestment, Calvinball government to keep the plates spinning. We won't starve or run out of TP. But not much can stop this new Gilded Age, especially now with AI as it is.

4

u/Rejusu 6h ago

Yup. This is so true of many things but money especially because it's much more abstract than size. People don't even have to be that poor, you can be making good money and still have zero appreciation for what being a billionaire means. I've almost given up pointing this out to people who think the money Rowling gets from various Harry Potter projects actually matters. To them it's still funding transphobia despite the fact Harry Potter could disappear off the face of the earth and she'd still be so rich that she could fund her campaign of hate until she dies and it wouldn't scratch the surface of her wealth.

I can respect avoiding it because of how you feel on the subject but anyone who thinks it makes a practical difference just can't appreciate scale.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)

28

u/ProxyMuncher 7h ago

Every day my horrible superiority complex about not using AI in any way shape or form is validated. 

→ More replies (3)

15

u/Dairunt 6h ago

I'm doing an AI course for work and it feels like joining a cult. They quote Altman word for word, and the guy says AI can be your lawyer, your accountant, your therapist and you will stay behind if you don't comply and hook your data and accounts to Gemini.

The AI space reeks of snake oil and it's making me feel disengaged on my career. (Software developer). Seeing slop everywhere it's making me numb at this point.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (19)

99

u/vissith 9h ago

this site is so horrendous on mobile holy shit

→ More replies (37)

56

u/soshibemuchwow 9h ago

not just the gaming industry...

21

u/NightSpaghetti 7h ago

I don't know if it's just me but the wind is turning really fast on LinkedIn. 6 months ago no one dared utter a word against AI in fear of being left behind. Now all I see is posts about how everyone is dead tired of AI and the workflows that go with it.

→ More replies (6)

101

u/TheOnesWhoFollow 9h ago

It's going to cripple the industry. You are going to have devs and staff tired of the rat race and move to other more stable careers leaving a void in the industry. I think this is when we will see one person or very small dev teams thrive. My only concern with that will be that quite a few indie devs over promise which can sink a project rather quickly.

70

u/ProtonDream 8h ago edited 8h ago

Another concern is the second an indie developer releases something successful, it's gobbled up by dozens of ai's and converted in a stream of shovelware.

15

u/DrAstralis 6h ago edited 1h ago

Omg this plague being set on the friend slop genre is maddening.. these are small studios trying to make a name and developing simple but "fun with friends" games. Its only unique for a few hours but its fun... then a week later come the 100 clones all trying to fit into this same tiny niche...

4

u/chiagod 5h ago

We can see that already in youtube. Look at all the copycat AI slop history channels.

Some are pumping out a video full of innacuracies and shit everyday whereas a good creator may take weeks to put out a single well researched and illustrated video.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

43

u/Pale-Try-4802 8h ago

I'm an animator and I'm really fucking tired of the rat race.

I worked for Epic, I've worked in Mobile and in AA. 

 The absolute best place I worked was the AA studio, enough funds to not always worry, not so much AAA corpo bullshit and not so much scummy mobile bullshit.

23

u/CyberSmith31337 7h ago

I also preferred the III/AA space when I worked in games.

True indie is just filled with con artists. Cheats, liars, and scammers who promise the moon but deliver nothing. Reddit portrays indie like it is some haven, but I have never seen more shitbags, but specifically unethical/immoral shitbags, than I did in true indie. 

And let’s not even talk about Kickstarter projects. Might as well come with the label ”I’m going to fuck over my employees and my backers and steal from the company’s treasury!” tattoo’d on their forehead like a fucking Scarlet letter. A gigantic green “S” for shitbag.

8

u/Peon-Hyjal 6h ago

Can't really blame Reddit, they only see indie from the success, not the failures.

It's kind of like how if you ask a Redditor what a gym is like, they'll tell you there's a bunch of influencers recording themselves everywhere.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/lavapig_love 5h ago

I helped write for an indie game about Hawai'i.

The dev team approached a whole lot of publishers, and they all turned them down because "nobody wants a game about Hawai'i". Except I'm Kanaka 'Oiwi. Do I want a game about my family and my history? YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT.

Did it do well? No. Did the people who played it love the concept? Yes. Did it introduce people who were unlikely to ever visit the islands, to a culture they were learning for the first time? Yes.

I'm proud I helped make it. If I want to pay bills, I can do something else.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

20

u/s8rlink 8h ago

What stable career? Does anyone millennial and bellow know what these worded mean? 

10

u/TheOnesWhoFollow 7h ago

I mean I have one in truck driving. The computer parts and dildos must be delivered. On time, every time.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/DelusionsOfExistence 7h ago

Developer here: The stable transfer positions are also being absorbed by AI. The most stable now is hope you have enough money and connections to be the shackleholder for the agents and not one of the unemployed.

6

u/TheOnesWhoFollow 7h ago

It terrible everywhere but you guys are just getting slammed. I haven't seen the job market this bad since the 2008 financial crisis. Even friends who work in the call center industry are getting layoffs and that is one of the few industries that doesn't layoff around here.

With the game space in particular there is absolutely no way to build a stable life around it. People don't understand it isn't just you who suffers when you get a layoff, it is everywhere you spend your money as well.

17

u/Owensey 8h ago

Maybe we're headed for a second video game crash? Last time it happened due to market saturation and waning interest. This time people aren't going to be able to afford the consoles to even run the latest games, and with AI slop taking over the market is just gonna get even more saturated. We're already seeing signs with the saturation of the extraction shooter genre, or even the battle royale genre.

8

u/DelusionsOfExistence 7h ago

Market saturation is about to be the norm.

4

u/Derpyzza 6h ago

i think we're headed for an everything crash tbh

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Krazyguy75 7h ago

Unlikely. What caused the crash was a lack of filtration. Good games and bad games were both being made, but there was no easy way to tell which were which.

Nowadays every site has review sections.

→ More replies (7)

12

u/TheOnesWhoFollow 7h ago

I think that's where we are headed, and I don't think it's going to be the same as the last one either. I suspect it's going to come down first to a lack of talent, second to the insane prices in the gaming space, and third the ever decreasing quality of games.

I have been gaming since the early 90s and it's been a steady decline since PS3 and 360. It's just everywhere now. Between console companies gouging for hardware and switching to digital, microtransactions in everything, day one DLC, games being released in a "good enough" state, and the ever increasing costs with the games themselves it's just bleak. I have switched how I purchase games now myself. If it isn't on sale I don't buy it now.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

34

u/The_Legend_of_Xeno 7h ago

Not in game dev but our big boss is completely clueless. Has no idea what he is doing and is just completely faking his job, and it's so bad it's super noticeable. They even hired an "Executive Coach" to come in and teach him how to do his job. He tried to frame it as the upper management is so impressed with him they are investing these resources (like a job coach) into him.

So naturally when AI took off, he latched onto it hardcore. All he ever talks about is AI. When we have our big department wide meetings, he asks everyone to please unmute and share their most recent AI use case. Nobody ever has anything to share. One time he himself shared that he asked Claude to analyze his son's grocery receipts to figure out where most of his grocery money was going. He said Claude churned for a few hours and couldn't do it, and just used up all his credits. What fantastic tech.

21

u/GracefulFaller 6h ago

How stupid is your boss? How can he botch using Claude that hard?

15

u/The_Legend_of_Xeno 6h ago

I'm not joking when I say he is completely clueless. He wasted like $8K of our funds on a Surface Hub for his office because he saw someone else had one and he thought it was cool. I had to set it up for him, and I told him that the side of his office where he wanted it didn't have a power outlet, so we'd have to have one put in. He said, "Well, it can still run on battery, right?" It's a 50" TV with a computer built into it. And he thought it ran on battery. They eventually ran power for him, and he used it maybe twice. It hasn't been used in years.

5

u/st_heron 6h ago

Jesus christ I don't understand how these people get into leadership positions. Is it all just the sweet talking of charisma?

4

u/The_Legend_of_Xeno 4h ago

He makes $350K a year, just fyi.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/enigmanaught 7h ago

I don’t think every game needs to be a labor of love but a couple of guys (at least initially) working on a game they want to see has turned out some pretty good games. Stardew Valley, Minecraft, the aforementioned Dwarf Fortress, etc.

I know No Man’s Sky has a large team, but the guy at the top has been pushing incremental improvements for the last 10 years with no loot boxes or pay to play. It’s not everyone’s cup of tea, but it’s no surprise they have such a loyal following.

Most businesses (gaming and otherwise) have moved towards the “only the next quarter is important” and AI fits perfectly into that strategy. Infinite growth isn’t sustainable.

The Simpsons said it over 20 years ago:

Bart: “bubbles can burst!?”

Repo Man: “yeah, but it’s a golden age for the repo business, an age that will never end…”

20

u/TheComplimentarian 7h ago

It's just Dunning-Kruger. The bosses don't understand the work. Because they don't understand the work, they think AI is a magic bullet that's going to solve all their problems. They fire people and go all in on AI...And now they're realizing they still have problems.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/Strange_Dust7128 6h ago

I hope video gaming is on a trajectory to be small and niche again.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/Phuka 5h ago

The people getting laid off have the skills, not the parasite CEOs or the investor class. We should be laying off middle and upper management.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/JeanLucPicardAND 6h ago

This is hardly limited to gaming. There is zero plan to deal with AI in any industry. They're just going to fire everybody and then be amazed when none of their customers can afford to buy their shit anymore.

8

u/ERedfieldh 4h ago

not just gaming. it's every industry. if it doesn't see massive push back now...like RIGHT NOW...expect layoffs the like you never dream possible in the next five years followed by the collapse of nearly every industry as they can no longer make money as they fired all the people who could buy their shit LLM produced products.

6

u/Locke03 4h ago

There is a huge pushback. People all over, across the political spectrum, are up in arms over AI datacenters being forced down the throat of every community that has a few dozen acres of open land and political leadership that will take AI industry bribes in exchange for tax incentives. The problem is that the powers that be have decided that AI datacenters are the most important thing in the universe, they will be built, and the technology will be integrated into everything possible come hell or high water and we are functionally at the point where public protest and polite civil action have reached the limits of their effectiveness.

→ More replies (8)

7

u/Sodacan259 5h ago

And in 10 years time, who is going to play the games if nobody outside of the 1% has a functioning computer because AI hoovered up all of the parts?

→ More replies (1)

6

u/thumbstickz 2h ago

Literally what drove me out of my industry I spent a decade in. I've landed in higher education running operations for a student union and I couldn't be happier.

5

u/S1DC 6h ago

This is because C-Suite culture is totally separate from the culture of the producers in each industry. Making games or otherwise, the C-Suite is there to manage assets and make money. When new "ways to make money" are introduced, especially ones purported to be a panacea like AI, if they aren't weaving the new buzzword into their lexicon they seem outdated within the C-Suite zeitgeist.

6

u/TheOneWithALongName Boardgames 3h ago

What I don't understand is why the AI haven't taken over the CEOs job. It should be the easiest task to replace.

5

u/Rmodsarescum 26m ago

Let's mass fire all CEOs replace them by AI.

112

u/Number1BestYogurtBoi 9h ago

Capitalism is a broken system

33

u/Lappora 7h ago

Every system eventually gets exploited to death by greedy humans.

→ More replies (6)

11

u/doublethink_1984 6h ago

Under what system then should game development exist under?

→ More replies (15)

45

u/MeowManMeow 9h ago

It was necessary to transition from agrarian to technological as a species. But it had been hanging around for about 80 years longer than needed. We have the CIA to thank for that.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (42)

4

u/Cesspoolofhumanity69 1h ago

I have read multiple reports from mutiple outlets and whistleblower accounts that tech CEOs are ALL suffering from AI psychosis at one level or another because they’re absolute suckers for exactly the type of ego stroking sycophancy.

And so all the shit they’re doing.. all the mass expansion of data centers… direct result of consulting their hallucinating oracles.

→ More replies (1)