Edit: for all the morons who think I'm PRO-AI, I'M NOT.
This is for the people with cavemen like mentality who say "AI = BAD".
Yes, I'm against DLSS 5, but people are blindly hating it for the wrong reasons and calling it "slop" which does nothing but satisfy their own ego. There's two problems with DLSS 5. The performance loss just isn't worth it. The cons outweigh the pros massively. Secondly, DLSS 5 is gonna make a lot of game devs like Ubisoft and EA, and maybe even indie devs lazy by making DLSS5 a norm and almost completely abandoning artstyles (which is already on the verge of dying) in games. We've reached to the point where graphics don't need to be realistic, they need to be stylized and unique. I just want all the blind AI haters to think rationally and not just blindly hate on something.
This is something i wanted to talk about so, feel free to speak up your mind, or keep on blinding hating, fyi i DO hate DLSS 5 but for the right reasons.
EDIT: I think a lot of people are misunderstanding my point. I am NOT defending DLSS 5. I am AGAINST DLSS 5 too. I think the performance cost isn't worth the visual improvement, and I'm concerned about what the widespread AI-based rendering could do to game development and artistic direction of all the upcoming games.
My point is that “AI = bad” or “it's slop” isn't an argument by itself. If you hate DLSS 5, hate it for actual reasons. Criticize its performance, visual artifacts, latency, potential impact on developers, art direction, etc. Don't blindly repeat “AI bad” simply because everyone else is saying it.
I'm not arguing against you. I'm arguing that we should have better reasons for reaching the same conclusion.